[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100722084413I.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:44:42 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: akataria@...are.com
Cc: fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
petr@...are.com
Subject: Re: swiotlb detection should be memory hotplug aware ?
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:13:34 -0700
Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com> wrote:
> > Basically, you want to add hot-plug memory and enable swiotlb, right?
>
> Not really, I am planning to do something like this,
>
> @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ int __init pci_swiotlb_detect(void)
>
> /* don't initialize swiotlb if iommu=off (no_iommu=1) */
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> - if (!no_iommu && max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN)
> + if (!no_iommu && (max_pfn > MAX_DMA32_PFN || hotplug_possible()))
> swiotlb = 1;
Always enable swiotlb with memory hotplug enabled? Wasting 64MB on a
x86_64 system with 128MB doesn't look to be a good idea. I don't think
that there is an easy solution for this issue though.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists