linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 11/11] writeback: prevent unnecessary bdi threads wakeups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1279790653.3044.35.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:24:13 +0300
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 11/11] writeback: prevent unnecessary bdi threads
 wakeups

On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 05:00 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 	 if (wakeup_bdi) {
> 	 	spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock);
> 		if (bdi->wb.task) {
> 			trace_writeback_wake_thread(bdi);
> 			wake_up_process(bdi->wb.task);
> 		} else {
> 			trace_writeback_wake_forker_thread(bdi);
> 			wake_up_process(default_backing_dev_info.wb.task);
> 		}
> 		spin_unlock(&bdi->wb_lock);
> 	}

Side note: I've noticed you've made the optimistic "if" condition first,
which is better, and I'll also amend this in v3.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/