linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] md: bitwise operations might not fit in a "bool"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100722215555.7ab2b1ee@notabene>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:55:55 +1000
From:	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de, jaxboe@...ionio.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: bitwise operations might not fit in a "bool"

On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:44:53 +0300
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:

> 
> when taking a resolute of a bit-wise AND as true false. Better / faster
> to make it a boolean operation.
> 
> This fixes a bug and a crash because the flags field did not fit into
> the bool operands.

No, that won't work.
Read the rest of the code and see where 'do_sync' and 'do_barriers' are used.

NeilBrown

> 
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
> ---
> git diff --stat -p -M drivers/md/raid1.c
>  drivers/md/raid1.c |   11 +++++++----
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index 73cc74f..67a9159 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static int make_request(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio * bio)
>  	struct bio_list bl;
>  	struct page **behind_pages = NULL;
>  	const int rw = bio_data_dir(bio);
> -	const bool do_sync = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
> +	const bool do_sync = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC) != 0;
>  	bool do_barriers;
>  	mdk_rdev_t *blocked_rdev;
>  
> @@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ static int make_request(mddev_t *mddev, struct bio * bio)
>  	atomic_set(&r1_bio->remaining, 0);
>  	atomic_set(&r1_bio->behind_remaining, 0);
>  
> -	do_barriers = bio->bi_rw & REQ_HARDBARRIER;
> +	do_barriers = (bio->bi_rw & REQ_HARDBARRIER) != 0;
>  	if (do_barriers)
>  		set_bit(R1BIO_Barrier, &r1_bio->state);
>  
> @@ -1640,7 +1640,8 @@ static void raid1d(mddev_t *mddev)
>  			 * We already have a nr_pending reference on these rdevs.
>  			 */
>  			int i;
> -			const bool do_sync = (r1_bio->master_bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC);
> +			const bool do_sync =
> +				(r1_bio->master_bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC) != 0;
>  			clear_bit(R1BIO_BarrierRetry, &r1_bio->state);
>  			clear_bit(R1BIO_Barrier, &r1_bio->state);
>  			for (i=0; i < conf->raid_disks; i++)
> @@ -1696,7 +1697,9 @@ static void raid1d(mddev_t *mddev)
>  				       (unsigned long long)r1_bio->sector);
>  				raid_end_bio_io(r1_bio);
>  			} else {
> -				const bool do_sync = r1_bio->master_bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC;
> +				const bool do_sync =
> +					(r1_bio->master_bio->bi_rw & REQ_SYNC)
> +					!= 0;
>  				r1_bio->bios[r1_bio->read_disk] =
>  					mddev->ro ? IO_BLOCKED : NULL;
>  				r1_bio->read_disk = disk;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/