[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C484E41.50606@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:57:21 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: "Jin, Gordon" <gordon.jin@...el.com>
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
"tim.gardner@...onical.com" <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
"jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org" <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"eric@...olt.net" <eric@...olt.net>,
Kees Cook <kees@...onical.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: i915 boot regression on Q35 chipset with 2.6.35-rc4
On 07/22/2010 11:19 AM, Jin, Gordon wrote:
> Chris Wilson wrote on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:37 PM:
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:35:22 +0200, Tim Gardner <tcanonical@....com>
>> wrote:
>>> What's up with this patch? I haven't received any comment, nor has it
>>> appeared in your git repository.
>>
>> Dave hasn't taken it because it is a regression fix for i915 and the
>> current procedure is for those to go through Eric's tree. Eric has
>> been busy working on a new compiler for GLSL the last few weeks and
>> has been applying patches in batches.
>>
>> The patch I am happy to ack, but since I introduced the regression
>> [https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16294], I'd rather have
>> someone more familiar with the intricacies of G33/G35/Q35 review it.
>>
>> For what is worth:
>> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
>
> This patch fixes the bug on our G33 (0x29b2).
FWIW works for me too.
And as this is present as of 35-rc1 upstream, this means almost 2 months
lag since the break till now. Could you guys sort this up ASAP, please?
thanks,
--
js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists