linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/3 v3] mm: iommu: An API to unify IOMMU, CPU and device memory management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100722164454.GF10255@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 09:44:56 -0700
From:	Zach Pfeffer <zpfeffer@...eaurora.org>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	linux@....linux.org.uk, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, dwalker@...eaurora.org, mel@....ul.ie,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3 v3] mm: iommu: An API to unify IOMMU, CPU and device
 memory management

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:43:26PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:30:34 -0700
> Zach Pfeffer <zpfeffer@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:44:37AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:20:01 -0700
> > > Zach Pfeffer <zpfeffer@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > I'm not saying that it's reasonable to pass (or even allocate) a 1MB
> > > > > buffer via the DMA API.
> > > > 
> > > > But given a bunch of large chunks of memory, is there any API that can
> > > > manage them (asked this on the other thread as well)?
> > > 
> > > What is the problem about mapping a 1MB buffer with the DMA API?
> > > 
> > > Possibly, an IOMMU can't find space for 1MB but it's not the problem
> > > of the DMA API.
> > 
> > This goes to the nub of the issue. We need a lot of 1 MB physically
> > contiguous chunks. The system is going to fragment and we'll never get
> > our 12 1 MB chunks that we'll need, since the DMA API allocator uses
> > the system pool it will never succeed. For this reason we reserve a
> > pool of 1 MB chunks (and 16 MB, 64 KB etc...) to satisfy our
> > requests. This same use case is seen on most embedded "media" engines
> > that are getting built today.
> 
> We don't need a new abstraction to reserve some memory.
> 
> If you want pre-allocated memory pool per device (and share them with
> some), the DMA API can for coherent memory (see
> dma_alloc_from_coherent). You can extend the DMA API if necessary.

That function won't work for us. We can't use
bitmap_find_free_region(), we need to use our own allocator. If
anything we need a dma_alloc_from_custom(my_allocator). Take a look
at:

mm: iommu: A physical allocator for the VCMM
vcm_alloc_max_munch() 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/