lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:56:39 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the scsi tree

Hi Jens,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c between commit
a953809f9d1deb97bb27716d773cadd2feebccf8 ("[SCSI] Log msg when getting
Unit Attention") from the scsi tree and commit
f9ccdfe846639f7a4529ccab78468b2207382380 ("scsi: use REQ_TYPE_FS for
flush request") from the block tree.

Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fax as
necessary.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
index c60cffb,2768bf6..0000000
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
@@@ -307,33 -307,7 +307,20 @@@ static int scsi_check_sense(struct scsi
  		    (sshdr.asc == 0x04) && (sshdr.ascq == 0x02))
  			return FAILED;
  
 +		if (sshdr.asc == 0x3f && sshdr.ascq == 0x0e)
 +			scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
 +				    "Warning! Received an indication that the "
 +				    "LUN assignments on this target have "
 +				    "changed. The Linux SCSI layer does not "
 +				    "automatically remap LUN assignments.\n");
 +		else if (sshdr.asc == 0x3f)
 +			scmd_printk(KERN_WARNING, scmd,
 +				    "Warning! Received an indication that the "
 +				    "operating parameters on this target have "
 +				    "changed. The Linux SCSI layer does not "
 +				    "automatically adjust these parameters.\n");
 +
- 		if (blk_barrier_rq(scmd->request))
- 			/*
- 			 * barrier requests should always retry on UA
- 			 * otherwise block will get a spurious error
- 			 */
- 			return NEEDS_RETRY;
- 		else
- 			/*
- 			 * for normal (non barrier) commands, pass the
- 			 * UA upwards for a determination in the
- 			 * completion functions
- 			 */
- 			return SUCCESS;
- 
+ 		return NEEDS_RETRY;
  		/* these three are not supported */
  	case COPY_ABORTED:
  	case VOLUME_OVERFLOW:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ