[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Oc08W-00CZuz-Ns@intern.SerNet.DE>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:04:41 +0200
From: Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke@...Net.DE>
To: Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make
extended file stats available [ver #6]
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:02:04AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:58:50PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > That would make it impossible to export the filesystem with NFSv2 and
> > v3. They do rely on ctime checking for certain operations (e.g. deciding
> > when to invalidate access and acl caches). NFSv4 needs this too if the
> > filesystem has no dedicated change attribute.
> >
> > Still, I suppose the market for exporting the same filesystem with both
> > NFS and Samba is limited...
>
> Ask NetApp about that :-). They have built a rather large
> business on just that fact :-).
Jeremy, how many hours have you spent getting "posix
locking" to the point where it is now? :-)
Volker
P.S: For those not aware, "posix locking = yes" is
cross-protocol byte range locking done by smbd to co-operate
with local processes and NFS.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists