linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cgroupfs: create /sys/fs/cgroup to mount cgroupfs on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100722211856.GA1297@suse.de>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:18:56 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
	Jan Safranek <jsafrane@...hat.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroupfs: create /sys/fs/cgroup to mount cgroupfs on

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:37:41PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> > > > We really shouldn't be asking userspace to create new root filesystems.
> > > > So follow along with all of the other in-kernel filesystems, and provide
> > > > a mount point in sysfs.
> > > >
> > > > For cgroupfs, this should be in /sys/fs/cgroup/  This change provides
> > > > that mount point when the cgroup filesystem is registered in the kernel.
> > > 
> > > But cgroups will typically have multiple mounts, with different
> > > resource controllers/options on each mount. That doesn't really fit in
> > > with this scheme.
> > 
> > Really?  I see systems mounting it at /cgroups/ in the filesystem today.
> > Where are you expecting it to be mounted at?
> > 
> 
> Greg,
> 
> [CCing few more folks who might be interested in this dicussion ]
> 
> We do want to retain facility to mount different controllers at different
> mount points. We were discussing the other day that in libvirt we might
> want to mount block IO controller and network controller separately as
> by default we will not put a new virtual machine in a cgroup of its own
> because of the penatly involved.

That's fine, I'm not changing that ability at all.  We just need a
"default" mount point for "normal" users.

> For other controllers like cpu, memory etc, libvirt automatically puts
> each new virtual machine in a cgroup of own. So this is one use case
> where we might want to mount different controllers at different mount
> points.
> 
> For my testing I now always use /cgroup/ and create directories under it
> /cgroup/blkio /cgroup/cpu etc and mount controllers on respective
> directories.

Lennart and Kay, is this what systemd is doing?  I really don't think we
should be adding a root /cgroup/ mount point to the system for something
like this.

Maybe /dev/cgroup/ is better to use, as that way users can create
sub-mount points easier.  They can't do that in /sys/fs/cgroup/

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/