[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100722041554.GB3446@amd>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:15:54 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add a dentry op to handle automounting rather
than abusing follow_link
This hasn't had much comments yet.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:55:50PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
>
> Add a dentry op (d_automount) to handle automounting directories rather than
> abusing the follow_link() inode operation.
>
> I've only changed __follow_mount() to handle automount points, but it might be
> necessary to change follow_mount() too. The latter is only used from
> follow_dotdot(), but any automounts on ".." should be pinned whilst we're using
> a child of it.
>
> AFS is made to use this facility so that it can be tested. Other filesystems
> abusing the follow_mount() inode operation will also need to be modified.
How about having a .follow_mount op, and using that instead of
default follow_mount in case mounted is incremented?
Also I would prefer the patch to add this call keep basically the
same API as follow_mount, so if you are going to change that to
return an error and do the NOFOLLOW handling in there, then
could you do that first, as a more trivial patch?
Then your addition of the d_op should not touch outside
*follow_mount.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists