linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] Driver core: Fix memory leak on bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100722234107.GB674@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:41:07 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Driver core: Fix memory leak on bus_register error
 path

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:09:02PM -0700, Patrick Pannuto wrote:
> There is a subtle memory leak in driver core error path.
> Consider the simplified view of bus_register (drivers/base/bus.c):
> 
> priv = kzalloc...
> kobject_set_name(&priv->subsys.kobj,...) <== allocate in priv->subsys.kobj.name
> if kset_register(&priv->subsys) FAILS:

Why would this fail?

> 	(1) -- need to free name string here!
> 	goto out
> else
> 	keep going, assume we fail later...
> 
> err_path_after_kset_register:
> 	kset_unregister(&priv->subsys) <== calls kobject_put(&priv->subsys->kobj),
>                                            which is the last reference, which leads
> 					   to kobject_cleanup, which frees the name
> 					   field BUT DOES NOT SET IT TO NULL
> out:
> 	(2) Other place we could free name
> 	kfree(bus->p) // bus->p = priv
> 	...
> 
> Thus, we cannot insert the free'ing of name on the error path (2) since it will
> be indeterminite if we need to free the name string or not. kset_register cannot (and
> should not) free the name string if it fails since the caller may have other ideas,
> leaving only (1) as a viable location to free the name string.
> 
> A walk-through of the failure path that will trigger this leak:
> 
> bus_register(struct bus_type *bus) {
> 	...
> 	priv = kzalloc...
> 	kobject_set_name(&priv->subsys.kobj,... {
> 		kobject_set_name_vargs(kobj,... {
> 			kobj->name = kvasprintf... <== ALLOCATE INTO &priv->subsys.kobj.name
> 
> 	priv->subsys.kobj.kset = bus_kset
> 	priv->subsys.kobj.ktype = &bus_ktype
> 
> 	retval = kset_register(&priv->subsys)...
> 	if (retval) YES
> 		goto out;
> 
> 	...
> out:
> 	kfree(bus->p);
> 	bus->p = NULL;
> 	return retval;
> }
> 
> kset_register(struct kset *k) { // k = &priv->subsys
> 	kset_init(k) {
> 		kobject_init_internal(&k->kobj) {
> 			kref_init(&kobj->kref) {
> 				kref->refcount = 1
> 
> 	err = kobject_add_internal(&k->kobj)...
> 	if (err) YES
> 		return err;
> 	...
> }
> 
> kobject_add_internal(struct kobject *kobj) { // kobj = &priv->subsys.kobj
> 	...
> 	if (kobj->kset) YES {
> 		kobj_kset_join(kobj) {
> 			kset_get(kobj->kset) <== bus_kset
> 	...
> 	error = create_dir(kobj);
> 	if (error) YES {
> 		kobj_kset_leave(kobj) {
> 			kset_put(kobj->kset) <== bus_kset
> 		... (release parent and make KERN_ERR noise)
> 	}
> 	return error
> }
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Pannuto <ppannuto@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/base/bus.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c
> index eb1b7fa..fea1774 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/bus.c
> @@ -900,8 +900,10 @@ int bus_register(struct bus_type *bus)
>  	priv->drivers_autoprobe = 1;
>  
>  	retval = kset_register(&priv->subsys);
> -	if (retval)
> +	if (retval) {
> +		kfree(priv->subsys.kobj.name);

I don't think we want to bury the logic of how kobject names are handled
up here in the bus code, right?  Shouldn't the subsys kobject name be
able to be cleaned up on its own somehow instead?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/