[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C494086.5080408@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:41:02 +0530
From: Trilok Soni <tsoni@...eaurora.org>
To: Kenneth Heitke <kheitke@...eaurora.org>
CC: khali@...ux-fr.org, ben-linux@...ff.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Crane Cai <crane.cai@....com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
srinidhi kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: QUP based bus driver for Qualcomm MSM chipsets
Hi Ken,
On 7/23/2010 8:17 AM, Kenneth Heitke wrote:
> This bus driver supports the QUP i2c hardware controller in the Qualcomm
> MSM SOCs. The Qualcomm Universal Peripheral Engine (QUP) is a general
> purpose data path engine with input/output FIFOs and an embedded i2c
> mini-core. The driver supports FIFO mode (for low bandwidth applications)
> and block mode (interrupt generated for each block-size data transfer).
> The driver currently does not support DMA transfers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kenneth Heitke <kheitke@...eaurora.org>
Thanks for the posting the driver.
> +
> +static void
> +qup_i2c_pwr_timer(unsigned long data)
> +{
> + struct qup_i2c_dev *dev = (struct qup_i2c_dev *) data;
> + dev_dbg(dev->dev, "QUP_Power: Inactivity based power management\n");
> + if (dev->clk_state == 1)
> + qup_i2c_pwr_mgmt(dev, 0);
> +}
Why this timer can't be converted to run-time PM functionality? I see this very much related
to what we are introducing in the Runtime-PM functionality, isn't it?
> +
> + if (!pdata->msm_i2c_config_gpio) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "config_gpio function not initialized\n");
> + ret = -ENOSYS;
> + goto err_config_failed;
> + }
I don't agree here. What if I do all the gpio configuration from the bootloader itself,
because I know that the device I am working on is production device and don't change
its configuration, then why I should provide the pdata hooks from the board files?
Please also specify what are the operations we are doing in the msm_i2c_config_gpio?
> +
> + /* We support frequencies upto FAST Mode(400KHz) */
> + if (pdata->clk_freq <= 0 ||
> + pdata->clk_freq > 400000) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clock frequency not supported\n");
Which freq? Should we add that freq value in the debug message?
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto err_config_failed;
> + }
> +
> + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct qup_i2c_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dev) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_alloc_dev_failed;
> + }
> +
> + dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> + if (in_irq)
> + dev->in_irq = in_irq->start;
> + if (out_irq)
> + dev->out_irq = out_irq->start;
> + dev->err_irq = err_irq->start;
> + if (in_irq && out_irq)
> + dev->num_irqs = 3;
> + else
> + dev->num_irqs = 1;
> + dev->clk = clk;
> + dev->pclk = pclk;
> + dev->base = ioremap(qup_mem->start, resource_size(qup_mem));
> + if (!dev->base) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_ioremap_failed;
> + }
> +
> + /* Configure GSBI block to use I2C functionality */
> + dev->gsbi = ioremap(gsbi_mem->start, resource_size(gsbi_mem));
> + if (!dev->gsbi) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_gsbi_failed;
> + }
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
> +
> + dev->one_bit_t = USEC_PER_SEC/pdata->clk_freq;
> + dev->pdata = pdata;
> + dev->clk_ctl = 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * We use num_irqs to also indicate if we got 3 interrupts or just 1.
> + * If we have just 1, we use err_irq as the general purpose irq
> + * and handle the changes in ISR accordingly
> + * Per Hardware guidelines, if we have 3 interrupts, they are always
> + * edge triggering, and if we have 1, it's always level-triggering
> + */
> + if (dev->num_irqs == 3) {
> + ret = request_irq(dev->in_irq, qup_i2c_interrupt,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "qup_in_intr", dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_in_irq failed\n");
> + goto err_request_irq_failed;
> + }
> + /*
> + * We assume out_irq exists if in_irq does since platform
> + * configuration either has 3 interrupts assigned to QUP or 1
> + */
> + ret = request_irq(dev->out_irq, qup_i2c_interrupt,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "qup_out_intr", dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_out_irq failed\n");
> + free_irq(dev->in_irq, dev);
> + goto err_request_irq_failed;
> + }
> + ret = request_irq(dev->err_irq, qup_i2c_interrupt,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "qup_err_intr", dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_err_irq failed\n");
> + free_irq(dev->out_irq, dev);
> + free_irq(dev->in_irq, dev);
> + goto err_request_irq_failed;
> + }
> + } else {
> + ret = request_irq(dev->err_irq, qup_i2c_interrupt,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, "qup_err_intr", dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "request_err_irq failed\n");
> + goto err_request_irq_failed;
> + }
> + }
> + disable_irq(dev->err_irq);
> + if (dev->num_irqs == 3) {
> + disable_irq(dev->in_irq);
> + disable_irq(dev->out_irq);
> + }
> + i2c_set_adapdata(&dev->adapter, dev);
> + dev->adapter.algo = &qup_i2c_algo;
> + strlcpy(dev->adapter.name,
> + "QUP I2C adapter",
> + sizeof(dev->adapter.name));
> + dev->adapter.nr = pdev->id;
> + pdata->msm_i2c_config_gpio(dev->adapter.nr, 1);
Why there is no error check here?
---Trilok Soni
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists