[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100723214233.7cb7de8d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:42:33 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the workqueues tree with the Linus'
tree
Hi Tejun,
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:34:55 +0200 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I was thinking about sending pull request w/ a note describing how to
> resolve the conflict. Would pulling in master before requesting pull
> be better?
Either would work. Linus is fine with doing merge fixups and, after all,
I figured it out. :-)
A description always helps, of course.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists