linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] ext4 trace events cause NULL pointer dereferences

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100723011315.GC16373@thunk.org>
Date:	Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:13:15 -0400
From:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] ext4 trace events cause NULL pointer dereferences

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:49:57AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> I think ext4 is simply using an incorrectly typed tracepoint here.
> If you want it to be useful in any way it needs a sb paramter and
> an optional inode paramter, not the allocation context.

I agree; this is the patch that I had whipped up to fix the problem.
(See below)

> Also the whole ext4_mb_release_group_pa function seems to be a bit
> misdesigned.  The code using ac is a totally separate block at the
> end of the function and does work that's unrelated to the rest
> of the function.  Just making it a separate helper can calling it
> only from those places that have the allocation context would make
> the code more clear.

I need to look more closely at this.  If I had time there would be a
lot of things that I'd be refactoring and cleaning up in mballoc.c....

       	      	       	  	      	  	   - Ted


>From 52f9a0d80ccdb1b23e364221167bb55b2886cc18 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 21:09:44 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix potential NULL dereference while tracing

The allocation_context pointer can be NULL.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c           |    4 ++--
 include/trace/events/ext4.h |   20 ++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 3dfad95..8b3b934 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3575,7 +3575,7 @@ ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct buffer_head *bitmap_bh,
 			trace_ext4_mballoc_discard(ac);
 		}
 
-		trace_ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(ac, pa, grp_blk_start + bit,
+		trace_ext4_mb_release_inode_pa(sb, ac, pa, grp_blk_start + bit,
 					       next - bit);
 		mb_free_blocks(pa->pa_inode, e4b, bit, next - bit);
 		bit = next + 1;
@@ -3606,7 +3606,7 @@ ext4_mb_release_group_pa(struct ext4_buddy *e4b,
 	ext4_group_t group;
 	ext4_grpblk_t bit;
 
-	trace_ext4_mb_release_group_pa(ac, pa);
+	trace_ext4_mb_release_group_pa(sb, ac, pa);
 	BUG_ON(pa->pa_deleted == 0);
 	ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb, pa->pa_pstart, &group, &bit);
 	BUG_ON(group != e4b->bd_group && pa->pa_len != 0);
diff --git a/include/trace/events/ext4.h b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
index f3865c7..01e9e00 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/ext4.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/ext4.h
@@ -395,11 +395,12 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(ext4__mb_new_pa, ext4_mb_new_group_pa,
 );
 
 TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_inode_pa,
-	TP_PROTO(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
+	TP_PROTO(struct super_block *sb,
+		 struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		 struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa,
 		 unsigned long long block, unsigned int count),
 
-	TP_ARGS(ac, pa, block, count),
+	TP_ARGS(sb, ac, pa, block, count),
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__field(	dev_t,	dev			)
@@ -410,8 +411,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_inode_pa,
 	),
 
 	TP_fast_assign(
-		__entry->dev		= ac->ac_sb->s_dev;
-		__entry->ino		= ac->ac_inode->i_ino;
+		__entry->dev		= sb->s_dev;
+		__entry->ino		= (ac && ac->ac_inode) ? 
+						ac->ac_inode->i_ino : 0;
 		__entry->block		= block;
 		__entry->count		= count;
 	),
@@ -422,10 +424,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_inode_pa,
 );
 
 TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_group_pa,
-	TP_PROTO(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
+	TP_PROTO(struct super_block *sb,
+		 struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
 		 struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa),
 
-	TP_ARGS(ac, pa),
+	TP_ARGS(sb, ac, pa),
 
 	TP_STRUCT__entry(
 		__field(	dev_t,	dev			)
@@ -436,8 +439,9 @@ TRACE_EVENT(ext4_mb_release_group_pa,
 	),
 
 	TP_fast_assign(
-		__entry->dev		= ac->ac_sb->s_dev;
-		__entry->ino		= ac->ac_inode->i_ino;
+		__entry->dev		= sb->s_dev;
+		__entry->ino		= (ac && ac->ac_inode) ?
+						ac->ac_inode->i_ino : 0;
 		__entry->pa_pstart	= pa->pa_pstart;
 		__entry->pa_len		= pa->pa_len;
 	),
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/