[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100723144143.GA14650@elliptictech.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:41:43 -0400
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [Bug #16265] Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
On 13:47 Fri 23 Jul , Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16265
> Subject : Why is kslowd accumulating so much CPU time?
> Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
> Date : 2010-06-09 18:36 (45 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/fbf81762e385d3d45acad057b654d56972acf58c
> Message-ID : <E1OMQ88-0002a1-Gb@...sure.thunk.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127610857819033&w=4
I actually haven't been able to reproduce with kernels since a couple
weeks ago (still reproducible if I go back to 2.6.35-rc3, though).
Seems to be fixed somehow, can anyone else confirm?
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists