| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTilAZqTOl7d2VIKg7dulYPwSKBbZzEISwnA036Hn@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:53:16 +0100 From: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@...il.com> To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>, eusou15@...oo.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, toralf.foerster@....de, ibm-acpi-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] [PATCH] Remove 9 second reboot delay on Lenovo T400/T500 On 17 July 2010 02:27, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:23:04PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >> I'm confused. Is it the PCI reboot vector, or the ACPI reboot vector >> that acts instantly? The bug reporters say that they use reboot=pci to >> have instant reboot, in this thread... > > The PCI one, since it's a function of the chipset. The ACPI one would > act instantly (it's the PCI one, in this case) but it's marked as > unsupported. However, the PCI one is poorly standardised - Windows never > uses it, different chips have subtly different requirements and so on. > > -- > Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org > So what should be done then? This is not the most annoying of bugs, but still a bug. Regards, Pedro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists