linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.35-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:16:15 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35-rc6

On Friday, July 23, 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:21:42AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> > 
> > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:26:13 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> >  I actually hope/think that this is going to be the last -rc. Things
> > > have been pretty quiet, and while this -rc has more commits than -rc5
> > > had, it's not by a large amount, nor does it look scary to me. So
> > > there doesn't seem to be any point in dragging out the release any
> > > more, unless we find something new that calls for it.
> > 
> > I have no idea how important this stuff is, but I still have the
> > following in linux-next that are (in theory) destined for v2.6.35:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Yes, there are a few minor USB patches in my tree (minor bugfixes and
> new device ids) that I wanted to send to you, but no need to hold up a
> .35 release.
> 
> We're still working on the network namespace sysfs issues, but if that
> option is disabled, all works fine.  I have 3 tiny patches to work to
> resolve that problem in my tree, I can send them to you tonight if you
> want.
> 
> But even there, nothing that should hold up .35 from release.

There are a few things, including regression fixes, in the ACPI land AFAICS.

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/