linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bonding: set device in RLB ARP packet handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100723202519.GT7497@gospo.rdu.redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:25:19 -0400
From:	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
To:	Greg Edwards <greg.edwards@...com>
Cc:	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
	"bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net" 
	<bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: set device in RLB ARP packet handler

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:59:47PM -0600, Greg Edwards wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 07:34:56PM +0000, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Greg Edwards <greg.edwards@...com> wrote:
> >> With commit 6146b1a4, the dev field in the RLB ARP packet handler was
> >> set to NULL to wildcard and accommodate balancing VLANs on top of
> >> bonds.
> >>
> >> This has the side-effect of the packet handler being called against
> >> other, non RLB-enabled bonds, and a kernel oops results when it tries
> >> to
> >> dereference rx_hashtbl in rlb_update_entry_from_arp(), which won't be
> >> set for those bonds, e.g. active-backup.
> >>
> >> With the __netif_receive_skb() changes from commit 1f3c8804, frames
> >> received on VLANs correctly make their way to the bond's handler,
> >> so we no longer need to wildcard the device.
> >
> > I see this problem as well, but I would propose to fix it another way to
> > not alter the receive path so close to the release of 2.6.35 and to
> > catch this for 802.3ad bonds as well.
> 
> Is the problem demonstrable with 802.3ad bonds?  bond_register_lacpdu()
> sets pk_type->dev = bond->dev.
> 

Doh!  You are right.

Plus Jay just posted your patch again, so we can go with that solution.

> >> Signed-off-by: Greg Edwards <greg.edwards@...com>
> >> ---
> >> Jay,
> >>
> >> The oops can be reproduced by:
> >>
> >> modprobe bonding
> >>
> >> echo active-backup > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/mode
> >> echo 100 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/miimon
> >> ifconfig bond0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> >> echo +eth0 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
> >> echo +eth1 > /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
> >>
> >> echo +bond1 > /sys/class/net/bonding_masters
> >> echo balance-alb > /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/mode
> >> echo 100 > /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/miimon
> >> ifconfig bond1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> >> echo +eth2 > /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/slaves
> >> echo +eth3 > /sys/class/net/bond1/bonding/slaves
> >>
> >> Pass some traffic on bond0.  Boom.
> >>
> >
> > bonding: make sure mode-specific handlers handle appropriate frames
> >
> > This patch will exit out of rlb_arp_recv and bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv early
> > if the bond receiving the frame isn't using that mode.
> 
> I had originally thought of doing something like this, but it didn't
> seem as clean.  I don't have strong feelings one way or the other,
> though.
> 
> Greg
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/