[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1279951270.4655.6.camel@localhost>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:01:10 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 14/14] writeback: add new tracepoints
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:29 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:05:54PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
> >
> > Add 2 new trace points to the periodic write-back wake up case, just like we do
> > in the 'bdi_queue_work()' function. Namely, introduce:
> >
> > 1. trace_writeback_wakeup(bdi)
> > 2. trace_writeback_wakeup_nothread(bdi)
> >
> > The first event is triggered every time we wake up a bdi thread to start
> > periodic background write-out. The second event is triggered only when the bdi
> > thread does not exist and should be created by the forker thread.
> >
> > This patch was suggested by Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
>
> As mentioned before doing the wakeup just for the case where we
> really wake up the flusher thead is much better. It's not 100%
> clear for bdi_queue_work as we queue the work in either case, but
> I'd prefer to fix that one up as well (not in your series anyway)
OK, I'll do it your way. Many thanks for review!
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists