[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C4AB036.3060003@postal.uv.es>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:19:50 +0200
From: Enrico Bandiello <enban@...tal.uv.es>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Enrico Bandiello <enban@...mni.uv.es>
Subject: Re: [Bug #16307] i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
On 07/23/2010 07:25 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:47:31 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki"<rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
>> of recent regressions.
>>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
>> know (either way).
>>
>>
>> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16307
>> Subject : i915 in kernel 2.6.35-rc3, high number of wakeups
>> Submitter : Enrico Bandiello<enban@...tal.uv.es>
>> Date : 2010-06-26 16:57 (28 days old)
>> Message-ID :<4C26317A.5070309@...tal.uv.es>
>> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127757403404259&w=2
>
> Just updated the bug for this one. Enrico, you say this behavior is
> recent. Can you bisect between 2.6.34 and when the problem started?
>
Hi. I just tried, but can't find anything useful until now (surely it's
my fault: it was my first attempt at bisection). Please let me try again
in the next days.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists