[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C4BF0D2.1070503@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 01:07:46 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@...mail.com>, jeff@...zik.org,
ben.collins@...ntu.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hmh@...ian.org
Subject: Re: support for drives larger than 2TiB
On 07/25/2010 01:01 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> (cc'ing hpa, hi!)
> Hello,
>
> On 07/24/2010 08:40 PM, Yuhong Bao wrote:
>>> However, 2TiB limit is
>>> inherent in the BIOS programming interface and currently the only way
>>> to overcome it is using a completely different BIOS interface (EFI,
>>> that is).
>>
>> Nope, look at the Int13 extensions, it already support 64-bit LBA.
>
> Ah, yeah, that sounds much more logical than requiring transition to
> EFI. Does anyone know how wide spread the support for this extension
> is in BIOSes? Do the bootloaders support this?
>
> Thanks.
>
Syslinux 4 supports it with full 64-bit capabilities. SeaBIOS (used in
Qemu/KVM) supports it, and I know at least some hardware/firmware RAID
solutions support it; I recently got access to a 3 TB SATA drive but due
to NDA requirements I can't reveal the results of that testing.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists