[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49iq42gz65.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:17:38 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Heinz Diehl <htd@...cy-poultry.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: don't allow aliased requests to starve others
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> writes:
> On 07/24/2010 10:04 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
>> On 14.07.2010, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>
>>> Comments, as always, are welcome.
>>
>> This patch, applied to 2.6.35-rc6, increases desktop interactivity
>> _NOTICEABLY_ on my quadcore machine, and the machine stays rock-stable.
>> I have now tested this patch with the latest 2.6.35-rc kernels over
>> 1 week.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I can't provide some testing results which makes this
>> statement more objective, but I'll do some synthetic testing in the next
>> days.
>
> It is extremely unlikely that this patch will have any impact on
> "normal" workloads. To even hit a code path where it would make a
> difference, you would need to use O_DIRECT IO, otherwise you cannot have
> aliases in the IO scheduler.
I agree that it shouldn't help normal workloads at all. I do think
there is one other case where you can get aliases: doing I/O both
through the file system and the underlying device. However, that's
obviously a bad idea (and maybe open_bdev_exclusive will keep that from
happening?).
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists