| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100726082935.GC13076@localhost>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:29:35 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages in
direct reclaim
> ==== CUT HERE ====
> vmscan: Do not writeback filesystem pages in direct reclaim
>
> When memory is under enough pressure, a process may enter direct
> reclaim to free pages in the same manner kswapd does. If a dirty page is
> encountered during the scan, this page is written to backing storage using
> mapping->writepage. This can result in very deep call stacks, particularly
> if the target storage or filesystem are complex. It has already been observed
> on XFS that the stack overflows but the problem is not XFS-specific.
>
> This patch prevents direct reclaim writing back filesystem pages by checking
> if current is kswapd or the page is anonymous before writing back. If the
> dirty pages cannot be written back, they are placed back on the LRU lists
> for either background writing by the BDI threads or kswapd. If in direct
> lumpy reclaim and dirty pages are encountered, the process will stall for
> the background flusher before trying to reclaim the pages again.
>
> As the call-chain for writing anonymous pages is not expected to be deep
> and they are not cleaned by flusher threads, anonymous pages are still
> written back in direct reclaim.
This is also a good step towards reducing pageout() calls. For better
IO performance the flusher threads should take more work from pageout().
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 6587155..45d9934 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,9 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
> #define scanning_global_lru(sc) (1)
> #endif
>
> +/* Direct lumpy reclaim waits up to 5 seconds for background cleaning */
> +#define MAX_SWAP_CLEAN_WAIT 50
> +
> static struct zone_reclaim_stat *get_reclaim_stat(struct zone *zone,
> struct scan_control *sc)
> {
> @@ -644,11 +647,13 @@ static noinline_for_stack void free_page_list(struct list_head *free_pages)
> */
> static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> struct scan_control *sc,
> - enum pageout_io sync_writeback)
> + enum pageout_io sync_writeback,
> + unsigned long *nr_still_dirty)
> {
> LIST_HEAD(ret_pages);
> LIST_HEAD(free_pages);
> int pgactivate = 0;
> + unsigned long nr_dirty = 0;
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
>
> cond_resched();
> @@ -742,6 +747,15 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
> }
>
> if (PageDirty(page)) {
> + /*
> + * Only kswapd can writeback filesystem pages to
> + * avoid risk of stack overflow
> + */
> + if (page_is_file_cache(page) && !current_is_kswapd()) {
> + nr_dirty++;
> + goto keep_locked;
> + }
> +
> if (references == PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN)
> goto keep_locked;
> if (!may_enter_fs)
> @@ -858,7 +872,7 @@ keep:
>
> free_page_list(&free_pages);
>
> - list_splice(&ret_pages, page_list);
> + *nr_still_dirty = nr_dirty;
> count_vm_events(PGACTIVATE, pgactivate);
> return nr_reclaimed;
> }
> @@ -1245,6 +1259,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct zone *zone,
> unsigned long nr_active;
> unsigned long nr_anon;
> unsigned long nr_file;
> + unsigned long nr_dirty;
>
> while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(zone, file, sc))) {
> congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
> @@ -1293,26 +1308,34 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct zone *zone,
>
> spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>
> - nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc, PAGEOUT_IO_ASYNC);
> + nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc, PAGEOUT_IO_ASYNC,
> + &nr_dirty);
>
> /*
> - * If we are direct reclaiming for contiguous pages and we do
> + * If specific pages are needed such as with direct reclaiming
> + * for contiguous pages or for memory containers and we do
> * not reclaim everything in the list, try again and wait
> - * for IO to complete. This will stall high-order allocations
> - * but that should be acceptable to the caller
> + * for IO to complete. This will stall callers that require
> + * specific pages but it should be acceptable to the caller
> */
> - if (nr_reclaimed < nr_taken && !current_is_kswapd() &&
> - sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode) {
> - congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
> + if (sc->may_writepage && !current_is_kswapd() &&
> + (sc->lumpy_reclaim_mode || sc->mem_cgroup)) {
> + int dirty_retry = MAX_SWAP_CLEAN_WAIT;
>
> - /*
> - * The attempt at page out may have made some
> - * of the pages active, mark them inactive again.
> - */
> - nr_active = clear_active_flags(&page_list, NULL);
> - count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_active);
> + while (nr_reclaimed < nr_taken && nr_dirty && dirty_retry--) {
> + wakeup_flusher_threads(laptop_mode ? 0 : nr_dirty);
> + congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
It needs good luck for the flusher threads to "happen to" sync the
dirty pages in our page_list. I'd rather take the logic as "there are
too many dirty pages, shrink them to avoid some future pageout() calls
and/or congestion_wait() stalls".
So the loop is likely to repeat MAX_SWAP_CLEAN_WAIT times. Let's remove it?
> - nr_reclaimed += shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc, PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC);
> + /*
> + * The attempt at page out may have made some
> + * of the pages active, mark them inactive again.
> + */
> + nr_active = clear_active_flags(&page_list, NULL);
> + count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_active);
> +
> + nr_reclaimed += shrink_page_list(&page_list, sc,
> + PAGEOUT_IO_SYNC, &nr_dirty);
This shrink_page_list() won't be called at all if nr_dirty==0 and
pageout() was called. This is a change of behavior. It can also be
fixed by removing the loop.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists