[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100727165250.GB26649@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:52:50 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] of: Create asm-generic/of.h and provide default
of_node_to_nid()
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:34:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 July 2010, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > I suggest to go back to v2 of your patch where you use asm-generic/of.h.
> >
> > Stephen suggested dropping asm-generic/of.h. I'm happy to do it either way.
>
> I don't mind adding stuff to asm-generic, but I think in this case it would
> be easier to keep this in linux/of.h because there is nothing wrong with
> all architectures including it.
>
> Most files in asm-generic are there only for historical reasons, where some
> architectures use them but others don't. IMHO we should use the include/linux
> headers preferred for new stuff though.
Hi Arnd.
Thanks for this explanation. Obviously my previous post
about asm-generic was wrong (as Grant already indicated).
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists