[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C4F1B6D.1070207@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:46:21 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Palfrader <peter@...frader.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 134/149] x86, paravirt: Add a global synchronization point
for pvclock
On 07/13/2010 11:15 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Avi Kivity<avi@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Well, current upstream uses "m":
> Yes, I'd expect current 2.6.34 to also show the same problem.
>
>> and works; I also failed to reproduce with 2.6.32.16. So I expect some
>> toolchain involvement.
> And yes, I do believe it's likely a newer gcc that triggers it too,
> otherwise we'd have seen more reports of it.
Did anyone get around to doing a proper fix for this? I don't see one
in tip.git or linux-2.6.git. And it needs to get back into stable...
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists