[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100727201207.GA16335@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:12:07 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] bdi: Use parent filesystem BDI for inodes not
capable of writeback
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:01:31PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > It shouldn't. Block device nodes are on the bdev filesystems, and
> Ok, so inode->i_sb->s_bdi will actually point to noop_backing_dev_info
> as set by set_anon_super(). Or am I completely out?
I think you're right. This seems rather bad if it's indeed true. I'll
quickly verify it using Dave's new tracing once I've built a block
tree kernel.
> > we twist the file->mapping pointer so that all the low-level read/write
> > code always deals with the bdev fs inode, and not the device node
> > filesystem.
>
> Yes, I know this but I fail to see how this influences where </dev/sda's
> inode>->i_sb->s_bdi ends up...
Ok, let's say we write to /dev/sda. For this we call
blkdev_aio_write -> __generic_file_aio_write
There we get the inode we operate on as
struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
struct address_space * mapping = file->f_mapping;
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
Now file->f_mapping gets set up in blkdev_open as:
filp->f_mapping = bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping;
so it does not point to the inode of the device node, but an inode on
the bdev filesystem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists