linux-kernel - [PATCH] tracing: sanitize value returned from write(trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100727230636.GA2826@joi.lan>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:06:36 +0200
From:	Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Emil Velikov <eeydev@...tingham.ac.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing: sanitize value returned from write(trace_marker,
 "...", len)

When userspace code writes non-new-line-terminated string to trace_marker
file, write handler appends new-line and returns number of bytes written
to trace buffer, so
write(fd, "abc", 3) will return 4

That's unexpected and unfortunately it confuses glibc's fprintf function.

Example:
int main() {
  fprintf(stderr, "abc");
  return 0;
}

results in infinite loop:
write(fd, "abc", 3) = 4
write(fd, "", 1) = 0
write(fd, "", 1) = 0
write(fd, "", 1) = 0
write(fd, "", 1) = 0
write(fd, "", 1) = 0
write(fd, "", 1) = 0
write(fd, "", 1) = 0
(...)

...and kernel trace buffer full of empty markers.

Fix it by sanitizing write return value.

Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 02e04c8..6b39aa8 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -3499,6 +3499,7 @@ tracing_mark_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 					size_t cnt, loff_t *fpos)
 {
 	char *buf;
+	size_t written;
 
 	if (tracing_disabled)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -3520,11 +3521,15 @@ tracing_mark_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 	} else
 		buf[cnt] = '\0';
 
-	cnt = mark_printk("%s", buf);
+	written = mark_printk("%s", buf);
 	kfree(buf);
-	*fpos += cnt;
+	*fpos += written;
 
-	return cnt;
+	/* don't tell userspace we wrote more - it might confuse them */
+	if (written > cnt)
+		written = cnt;
+
+	return written;
 }
 
 static int tracing_clock_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
-- 
1.7.1.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/