linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100727133207.9b6846fe.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:32:07 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Xen Devel <Xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c between commit
ff4878089e1eaeac79d57878ad4ea32910fb4037 ("x86: Do not try to disable
hpet if it hasn't been initialized before") from Linus' tree and commit
ef7612e63eafaa6101f5d3185ed8d9bf232ba627 ("x86: Do not try to disable
hpet if it hasn't been initialized before") from the xen tree.

Two versions of the same patch.  I used the version from Linus' tree
since it was dated later and had been modified by Thomas.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped