[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1280189955.26200.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:19:15 +0200
From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V7: Add support for non-PDP11 v7 filesystems
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 16:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:59:16 +0200
> Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk> wrote:
>
> > This adds byte order autodetection (of PDP-11 and LE filesystems).
> > No attempt is made to detect big-endian filesystems -- were there any?
> > Tested with PDP-11 v7 filesystems and PC-IX maintenance floppy.
>
> Which kernel is this against? My v7_fill_super() is significantly
> different from yours.
This depends on [PATCH] V7: Adjust sanity checks for some volumes
<1279761108-302-1-git-send-email-lkundrak@...sk>.
It might be that I've messed up something in the communication so that
the dependency was not immediately clear. To be honest, I'm not very
familiar with the way reviews and adjustements to patches are tracked.
What have I done wrong, here? How am I supposed to follow up with a
change to a single patch of a multi-patch (be it just two in this case)
set?
--
Flash is the Web2.0 version of blink and animated gifs.
-- Stephen Smoogen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists