[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100728064723.GA14914@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:47:23 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] kconfig: introduce alldefconfig + savedefconfig
Hi Sam,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 11:38:08PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> After reading some of the mails about the
> defconfig files I decided to take a look at kconfig.
>
> We already decided to go for a solution where the defconfig
> files contains only the minimal configuration.
> Uwe developed a script to assist but having native support
> in kconfig is preferable.
>
> This patch set introduce "alldefconfig".
> alldefconfig create a configuration with all values set
> to default values.
> This can be usefull when we check if we do have a sane
> set of default values. Rhe config can be inspected
> using menuconfig.
>
> The patches also introduce "savedefconfig" which
> reads the current configuration and save it
> as a minimal configuration.
>
> In my testing I benchmarked it with one
> of the arm defconfings and the final result is
> the same (symbols appear in different order).
I would prefer to have them in the same order. I havn't checked the
details, but I really like getting support for minimal defconfigs done
in kconfig directly.
Thanks
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists