[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin4EAQ48HP3ETDUMqBe2AzcznRuZdBdG+_RhR8x@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:11:19 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...ricsson.com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Jonas Aaberg <jonas.aberg@...ricsson.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the async_tx tree with the arm tree
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the async_tx tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-db8500.c between commit
> 6055930cba8fdb2c8855b32bae262aaf69c1fdb4 ("ARM: 6266/1: ux500: add
> separate irq lists for DB8500 and DB5500") from the arm tree and commit
> 5aa12e8c9c57741606e52f43e62ab1b9dc8e9dcc ("DMAENGINE: ste_dma40: arch
> updates for LCLA and LCPA") from the async_tx tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> --
Thanks Stephen!
Russell, the dma40 driver updates and related arch fixups have been
sitting in next for a month, I'd prefer not to lose this baseline.
Assuming this change is brand new any chance the dma40 specific part
of this patch can be peeled off and sent through my tree, or are you
in a similar "can't/won't" rebase position?
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists