[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100728121822.GH26098@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:18:22 +0200
From: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: SVM: Emulate next_rip svm feature
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 07:57:36AM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
> If the instruction opcode is on mmio, the processor never sees the
> opcode and thus can not intercept. Or the processor may see one
> instruction, which is not intercepted, but by the time the emulator
> kicks in a different instruction takes its place, since another vcpu is
> evilly cross-modifying the code.
Right. X-modifying code is a problem too.
> The guest (L2 in this case) is doomed since it execution cannot
> continue. But L1 and L0 are fine. The problem with L2 avoiding
> intercepts is that L2 can change control registers and take over L1.
Right too. We can not ignore it. The right fix is probably a check for
the instruction intercepts right after the decoder has run and before
the emulator ran.
Joer
--
Joerg Roedel - AMD Operating System Research Center
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Landkr. Muenchen; Registerger. Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists