[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1280282802-10618-1-git-send-email-johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:06:41 -0700
From: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Remove stop_machine from change_clocksource
To me, there isn't a clear reason why we're using stop_machine
when changing clocksources instead of just taking the xtime_lock.
Additionally, using stop_machine limits us from being able to
register clocksources from timers (as needed for a following
patch).
This patch simply removes the stop_machine usage and instead
directly calls change_clocksource, which now takes the xtime_lock.
I could be totally missing something here that necessitates
stop_machine, but in my testing it seems to function fine.
Any clarifications or corrections would be appreciated!
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
CC: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index e14c839..fa2cc41 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
-#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
/* Structure holding internal timekeeping values. */
struct timekeeper {
@@ -345,12 +344,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_settimeofday);
*
* Accumulates current time interval and initializes new clocksource
*/
-static int change_clocksource(void *data)
+static int change_clocksource(struct clocksource *new)
{
- struct clocksource *new, *old;
-
- new = (struct clocksource *) data;
+ struct clocksource *old;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ write_seqlock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags);
timekeeping_forward_now();
if (!new->enable || new->enable(new) == 0) {
old = timekeeper.clock;
@@ -358,6 +357,7 @@ static int change_clocksource(void *data)
if (old->disable)
old->disable(old);
}
+ write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ void timekeeping_notify(struct clocksource *clock)
{
if (timekeeper.clock == clock)
return;
- stop_machine(change_clocksource, clock, NULL);
+ change_clocksource(clock);
tick_clock_notify();
}
--
1.6.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists