linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/5] staging:ti dspbridge: remove unnecessary check for NULL pointer in cmm.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:29:39 -0500
From:	"Ramos Falcon, Ernesto" <ernesto@...com>
To:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
CC:	"Menon, Nishanth" <nm@...com>, "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
	"Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@...com>,
	"ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
	"ameya.palande@...ia.com" <ameya.palande@...ia.com>,
	"felipe.contreras@...ia.com" <felipe.contreras@...ia.com>,
	"Guzman Lugo, Fernando" <fernando.lugo@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] staging:ti dspbridge: remove unnecessary check for
 	NULL pointer in cmm.c

Agree! I'll send new version of this patch.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Felipe Contreras [mailto:felipe.contreras@...il.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 12:12 PM
>To: Ramos Falcon, Ernesto
>Cc: Menon, Nishanth; gregkh@...e.de; Ramirez Luna, Omar; ohad@...ery.com;
>ameya.palande@...ia.com; felipe.contreras@...ia.com; Guzman Lugo, Fernando;
>linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; andy.shevchenko@...il.com; linux-
>omap@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] staging:ti dspbridge: remove unnecessary check for
>NULL pointer in cmm.c
>
>Hi Ernesto,
>
>On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ramos Falcon, Ernesto <ernesto@...com>
>wrote:
>>>here is a better approach:
>>>remove cmm_xlator_delete altogether
>
>[...]
>
>> I considered this approach before but in terms of maintainability I
>thought it was easier to locate where translator tables are destroy if we
>keep cmm_xlator_delete function.
>
>That's not maintainability, that's debugging convenience. AFAIU linux
>is all about maintenance, because that provides real, tangible, and
>proven gains. Debugging convenience gains are hypothetical; you don't
>really know how useful it will be to have a separate free function.
>
>And please avoid bottom-posting, instead use interleaved style,
>otherwise people see a comment, and then have to scroll down to see
>the answer.
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
>
>--
>Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/