[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C506AD0.4070608@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:37:20 -0400
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Andy Chittenden <andyc@...earc.com>
CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List (linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nfs client hang
On 07/28/10 03:24 AM, Andy Chittenden wrote:
> resending as it seems to have been corrupted on LKML!
>
>> The RPC client marks the socket closed. and the linger timeout is
>> cancelled. At this point, sk_shutdown should be set to zero, correct?
>> I don't see an xs_error_report() call here, which would confirm that the
>> socket took a trip through tcp_disconnect().
>
> From my reading of tcp_disconnect(), it calls sk->sk_error_report(sk)
> unconditionally so as there's no xs_error_report(), that surely means
> the exact opposite: tcp_disconnect() wasn't called. If it's not
> called, sk_shutdown is not cleared. And my revised tracing confirmed
> that it was set to SEND_SHUTDOWN.
Sorry, that's what I meant above.
An xs_error_report() debugging message at that point in the log would
confirm that the socket took a trip through tcp_disconnect(). But I
don't see such a message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists