[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=bkp+JJYQ7dF36Up3gcjJR8LypgfKBWZHLfPH-@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:12:48 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yuanyabin1978@...a.com, Peter Pearse <peter.pearse@....com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...pv.it>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>,
Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] DMAENGINE: driver for the ARM PL080/PL081 PrimeCells
2010/7/28 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Linus Walleij
> <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com> wrote:
>> This creates a DMAengine driver for the ARM PL080/PL081 PrimeCells
>> based on the implementation earlier submitted by Peter Pearse.
>> This is working like a charm for memcpy and slave DMA to the PL011
>> PrimeCell on the PB11MPCore.
>
> Russell I am assuming this implementation and testing is sufficient to
> allay your prior nak [1]? Linus is oversubscribing virtual channels
> to physical channels to handle muxing.
I don't think Russell has ever NAK:ed the PL08x driver(s). The NAK
was about the PrimeCell DMA extenstions to amba-pl011.c etc.
(Still I'm happy if Russell looks at this thing of course.)
This patch along with the generic channel control removed the
cross-dependency between the PrimeCell DMA patchset and the
drivers/dma DMA engine framework (yay!) so there is no arch/arm
or AMBA stuff involved anymore, other than the fact that this driver
sits on the AMBA/PrimeCell bus.
>> +#ifdef MODULE
>> +
>> +# error "AMBA PL08X DMA CANNOT BE COMPILED AS A LOADABLE MODULE AT PRESENT"
>> +
>> +/*
>> + a) Some devices might make use of DMA during boot
>> + (esp true for DMAENGINE implementation)
>> + b) Memory allocation will need much more attention
>> + before load/unload can be supported
>> + */
>> +#endif
>
> This is taken care of by being "config bool", but I assume you want
> this for documentation purposes?
Peter had that in and I didn't remove it. If you don't like it you
can remove it or I can send a new patch.
>> + txd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pl08x_txd), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> ...appears in the prep routines. Will this driver be used by any
> storage controllers on the platfom? Might we deadlock waiting on i/o
> that needs to allocate a descriptor to complete?
I haven't noticed anything but a descriptor pool is on my
list of things to look into and fix.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists