[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1280394214.24292.1594.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:03:34 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...abs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] irq: rename IRQF_TIMER to IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 09:49 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > Continue to provide IRQF_TIMER as an alias to IRQF_NO_SUSPEND since I
> > think it is worth preserving the nice self-documenting name (where it
> > is used appropriately). It also avoid needing to patch all the many
> > users who are using the flag for an actual timer interrupt.
>
> I'm not happy about the alias. What about:
>
> #define __IRQF_TIMER 0x00000200
> #define IRQF_NO_SUSPEND 0x00000400
>
> #define IRQF_TIMER (__IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_NO_SUSPEND)
Sure, I'll rework along those lines.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists