[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C515C34.9090005@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:47:16 +0800
From: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.yan@...cle.com>
CC: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: fix a wrong error check in add_ra_bio_pages()
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:38:39 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> 2010/7/29 Miao Xie<miaox@...fujitsu.com>:
>> From: Liu Bo<liubo2009@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> Only when a page is not found by page_index, we'll go to the error check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo<liubo2009@...fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie<miaox@...fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/compression.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/compression.c b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
>> index cb3877c..8458840 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/compression.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/compression.c
>> @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static noinline int add_ra_bio_pages(struct inode *inode,
>> rcu_read_lock();
>> page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, page_index);
>> rcu_read_unlock();
>> - if (page) {
>> + if (!page) {
>> check_misses:
>> misses++;
>> if (misses> 4)
>
> This patch is wrong. The word "miss" here means "miss for read-ahead because
> the page is already in the page cache"
Oh, my mistake. Sorry!
Please ignore this patch.
Thanks for your review! How about the others?
Miao
>
> Yan, Zheng
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists