[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100729190515.6ec85db2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:05:15 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc: Mattia Jona-Lasinio <mattia.jona@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lcd-linux-users@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Introducing the LCD-Linux project
> 3) Invert the VT layer. Currently the console/printk driver is on top of
> the tty layer. It would be nice to be able to only use a very light
> weight vt printk without the VT tty on top for embedded platforms.
No. printk hits console drivers why may or may not be frame buffer
interfaces. Has done for a very long time. Keith Packard has also been
doing stuff with crash time oops displays etc over an X display.
> 4) Seperate out the VT emulation layer. Related to 3.
Separate from what ?
> 5) Multiple independent VT support. Which brings up the question what
> should the mapping of VCs to a VT look like.
I would suggest we borrow the X idea and each VC is
int display; /* Display it is on (for console flipping) */
struct something *vt; /* VT which it is displaying */
int x,y,w,h; /* Window onto vt */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists