[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik4oyv4edZ6dyKiA59C9TSHWn2grQqTh30MRmC=@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:03:14 +0100
From: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.35-rc6 patch] increase kmemleak robustness at boot
On 29 July 2010 16:12, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>>>
>>> I would rather change the static early alloc buffer with something
>>> like bootmem allocation (the recursiveness should be bound, kmemleak
>>> tracks bootmem allocations as well). But I'm on holiday until middle
>>> of August and not able to do any tests in this area.
>>
>> Indeed, moving to dynamic early allocation is all the more better. For
>> now, I'll increase the early allocation to 15200 elements, as the
>> 400-entry buffer wraps 38.
>
> If it's just kmemleak_init() we're talking about, slab caches are up at that
> point so you can just use kmalloc().
The slab allocator isn't up at this point. With
CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE set to 16K elements, an extra 3MB
of __initdata memory is used, but freed afterwards, and it works
great.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists