[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100729211310.GA28330@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:13:10 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tight check of pfn_valid on sparsemem - v4
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 02:55:53PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> > And no, setting the sparse section size to 512kB doesn't work - memory is
> > offset by 256MB already, so you need a sparsemem section array of 1024
> > entries just to cover that - with the full 256MB populated, that's 512
> > unused entries followed by 512 used entries. That too is going to waste
> > memory like nobodies business.
>
> SPARSEMEM EXTREME does not handle that?
>
> Some ARMs seem to have MMUs. If so then use SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP. You can map
> 4k pages for the mmap through a page table. Redirect unused 4k blocks to
> the NULL page.
We're going over old ground which has already been covered in this very
thread. I've no compunction to repeat the arguments.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists