[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C52BEA2.8030302@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:59:30 -0500
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [8/23] KGDB: Remove set but unused newPC
On 06/10/2010 06:10 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I'm not fully sure this is the correct fix, maybe this
> was a bug and newPC should really have a side effect.
> Jason?
>
>
Andi,
This looks fine to me. The newPC got there from the merge of the 32/64
kgdb specific implementation. Definitely don't need it anymore.
I'll queue it for 2.6.36.
Thanks,
Jason.
> Found by gcc 4.6's new warnings
>
> Cc: jason.wessel@...driver.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.35-rc2-gcc/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.35-rc2-gcc.orig/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
> +++ linux-2.6.35-rc2-gcc/arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c
> @@ -458,7 +458,6 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int e_vec
> {
> unsigned long addr;
> char *ptr;
> - int newPC;
>
> switch (remcomInBuffer[0]) {
> case 'c':
> @@ -469,8 +468,6 @@ int kgdb_arch_handle_exception(int e_vec
> linux_regs->ip = addr;
> case 'D':
> case 'k':
> - newPC = linux_regs->ip;
> -
> /* clear the trace bit */
> linux_regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
> atomic_set(&kgdb_cpu_doing_single_step, -1);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists