[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100730165955.294243235@clark.site>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:57:33 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Andre Osterhues <aosterhues@...rypt.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [17/17] ecryptfs: Bugfix for error related to ecryptfs_hash_buckets
2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Andre Osterhues <aosterhues@...rypt.com>
commit a6f80fb7b5986fda663d94079d3bba0937a6b6ff upstream.
The function ecryptfs_uid_hash wrongly assumes that the
second parameter to hash_long() is the number of hash
buckets instead of the number of hash bits.
This patch fixes that and renames the variable
ecryptfs_hash_buckets to ecryptfs_hash_bits to make it
clearer.
Fixes: CVE-2010-2492
Signed-off-by: Andre Osterhues <aosterhues@...rypt.com>
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c
@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ static struct mutex ecryptfs_msg_ctx_lis
static struct hlist_head *ecryptfs_daemon_hash;
struct mutex ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux;
-static int ecryptfs_hash_buckets;
+static int ecryptfs_hash_bits;
#define ecryptfs_uid_hash(uid) \
- hash_long((unsigned long)uid, ecryptfs_hash_buckets)
+ hash_long((unsigned long)uid, ecryptfs_hash_bits)
static u32 ecryptfs_msg_counter;
static struct ecryptfs_msg_ctx *ecryptfs_msg_ctx_arr;
@@ -599,18 +599,19 @@ int ecryptfs_init_messaging(unsigned int
}
mutex_init(&ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux);
mutex_lock(&ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux);
- ecryptfs_hash_buckets = 1;
- while (ecryptfs_number_of_users >> ecryptfs_hash_buckets)
- ecryptfs_hash_buckets++;
+ ecryptfs_hash_bits = 1;
+ while (ecryptfs_number_of_users >> ecryptfs_hash_bits)
+ ecryptfs_hash_bits++;
ecryptfs_daemon_hash = kmalloc((sizeof(struct hlist_head)
- * ecryptfs_hash_buckets), GFP_KERNEL);
+ * (1 << ecryptfs_hash_bits)),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ecryptfs_daemon_hash) {
rc = -ENOMEM;
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failed to allocate memory\n", __func__);
mutex_unlock(&ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux);
goto out;
}
- for (i = 0; i < ecryptfs_hash_buckets; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < (1 << ecryptfs_hash_bits); i++)
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&ecryptfs_daemon_hash[i]);
mutex_unlock(&ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux);
ecryptfs_msg_ctx_arr = kmalloc((sizeof(struct ecryptfs_msg_ctx)
@@ -680,7 +681,7 @@ void ecryptfs_release_messaging(unsigned
int i;
mutex_lock(&ecryptfs_daemon_hash_mux);
- for (i = 0; i < ecryptfs_hash_buckets; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < (1 << ecryptfs_hash_bits); i++) {
int rc;
hlist_for_each_entry(daemon, elem,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists