[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTing_3HoC9oWNheHJPgQWp2xmN6-C_cyZxoJUqc_@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:10:10 -0700
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Memory corruption during hibernation since 2.6.31
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:01 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> I think the best way is kexec(). But maybe rollback from hibernation failure
> will be difficult. Considering how crash-dump works well and under maintainance
> by many enterprise guys, hibernation-by-kexec is a choice. I think. It can make
> reuse of kdump code, ...or, hibernation-resume code can eat kdump image
> directly. Maybe the problem will be the speed of dump.
I've no appetite for a total rework of hibernation, and I don't see
how that would
address the issue: I'm just looking for some protection against swap
reuse danger.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists