linux-kernel - [092/205] sysvfs: fix NULL deref. when allocating new inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100730175142.021229423@clark.site>
Date:	Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:51:49 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [092/205] sysvfs: fix NULL deref. when allocating new inode

2.6.34-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>

commit 46c23d7f520e315dde86881b38ba92ebdf34ced5 upstream.

A call to sysv_write_inode() in sysv_new_inode() to its new interface that
replaced wait flag with writeback structure.  This was broken by
a9185b41a4f84971b930c519f0c63bd450c4810d ("pass writeback_control to
->write_inode").

Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/sysv/ialloc.c |    6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/sysv/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/sysv/ialloc.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
 #include <linux/stat.h>
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
+#include <linux/writeback.h>
 #include "sysv.h"
 
 /* We don't trust the value of
@@ -139,6 +140,9 @@ struct inode * sysv_new_inode(const stru
 	struct inode *inode;
 	sysv_ino_t ino;
 	unsigned count;
+	struct writeback_control wbc = {
+		.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE
+	};
 
 	inode = new_inode(sb);
 	if (!inode)
@@ -177,7 +181,7 @@ struct inode * sysv_new_inode(const stru
 	mark_inode_dirty(inode);
 
 	inode->i_mode = mode;		/* for sysv_write_inode() */
-	sysv_write_inode(inode, 0);	/* ensure inode not allocated again */
+	sysv_write_inode(inode, &wbc);	/* ensure inode not allocated again */
 	mark_inode_dirty(inode);	/* cleared by sysv_write_inode() */
 	/* That's it. */
 	unlock_super(sb);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/