[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1280532174.2583.1.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:22:54 +1000
From: Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Compress hibernation image with LZO (in-kernel)
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 08:05 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Is an order 6 allocation really necessary,
> though?
I tried with 5 and 4 and got slightly lower throughput numbers. With 6,
I was getting 145 to 150 MB/s, with 4 I'm getting around 130 MB/s (this
is all on hibernate).
So, here is one with 4.
PS. I guess with this, read_sync can simply disappear as well.
--
Bojan
View attachment "hibernate-lzo.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (6533 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists