lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1280532174.2583.1.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
Date:	Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:22:54 +1000
From:	Bojan Smojver <bojan@...ursive.com>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...onice.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Compress hibernation image with LZO (in-kernel)

On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 08:05 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Is an order 6 allocation really necessary, 
> though? 

I tried with 5 and 4 and got slightly lower throughput numbers. With 6,
I was getting 145 to 150 MB/s, with 4 I'm getting around 130 MB/s (this
is all on hibernate).

So, here is one with 4.

PS. I guess with this, read_sync can simply disappear as well.

-- 
Bojan

View attachment "hibernate-lzo.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (6533 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ