[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100731191743.GF26313@bicker>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:17:43 +0200
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@...il.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Dinh Nguyen <Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] usb: fsl_udc_core: check return value of
create_proc_read_entry()
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 09:38:20PM +0400, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> create_proc_read_entry() may fail, if so return -ENOMEM.
>
It can fail, but also we return NULL if procfs is disabled. I haven't
looked at it very carefully, would this patch break the module if procfs
was disabled?
The same applies to the similar patches in this set.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists