[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100731213138.GC29357@lenovo>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 01:31:38 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,setup: add serial_console_port_base in boot_params
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 02:02:53PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 11:32 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >>
> >> No, this is the internal part of the boot protocol, so it's not an issue.
> >>
> >
> > Peter, I didn't mean any issue here, I meant that bootloaders don't know about
> > this field yet and they will have to update own sources to pass port value
> > at proper place of boot params. Or I miss something?
> >
>
> Boot loaders that use the 16-bit entry point are unaffected.
>
> Boot loaders which use the 32-bit entry point but properly clears the
> zero page simply will not have the feature.
>
> Boot loaders which use the 32-bit entry point but doesn't clear the zero
> page are broken.
>
> -hpa
>
Well, Peter, seems I messed boot params with setup header. So I don't see
any user of this field then, hmm...
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists