[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1007311006070.19122@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 10:08:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: utz lehmann <lkml123@...4n2c.de>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>, Volker.Lendecke@...net.de,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsde@...per.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended
file stats available [ver #6]
On Friday 2010-07-30 23:22, utz lehmann wrote:
>On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 09:40 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> But the fact is, th Unix ctime semantics are insane and largely
>> useless. There's a damn good reason almost nobody uses ctime under
>> unix.
>>
>> So what I'm suggesting is that we have a flag - either per-process or
>> per-mount - that just says "use windows semantics for ctime".
>
>When abusing an existing time stamp use atime not ctime please.
>ctime has it's uses. atime was just a mistake and is nearly useless.
MUAs make use of atime.
>And with noatime we already have creation time semantics for atime.
noatime was a late afterthought, and because it can interfere with
some programs, relatime came along too.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists