[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimcH7+Bq1UEbaSU7SQpzArPgmSLegiqE13V8=CF@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 11:01:04 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.34
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16400
> Subject : 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state
> Submitter : Martin Pirker <lkml.collector@...il.com>
> Date : 2010-07-14 20:33 (19 days old)
> Message-ID : <AANLkTikDF0TL6OyPVCzPlUTwxFehcrETn3ysgSSeTq92@...l.gmail.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127913961025267&w=2
This has a proposed patch. I don't know what the status of it is, though. Jens?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127950018204029&w=2
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16393
> Subject : kernel BUG at fs/block_dev.c:765!
> Submitter : Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
> Date : 2010-07-14 13:52 (19 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100714135217.GA1797@...h.tripp.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127911564213748&w=2
This one is interesting. And I think I perhaps see where it's coming from.
bd_start_claiming() (through bd_prepare_to_claim()) has two separate
success cases: either there was no holder (bd_claiming is NULL) or the
new holder was already claiming it (bd_claiming == holder).
Note in particular the case of the holder _already_ holding it. What happens is:
- bd_start_claiming() succeeds because we had _already_ claimed it
with the same holder
- then some error happens, and we call bd_abort_claiming(), which
does whole->bd_claiming = NULL;
- the original holder thinks it still holds the bd, but it has been released!
- a new claimer comes in, and succeeds because bd_claiming is now NULL.
- we now have two "owners" of the bd, but bd_claiming only points to
the second one.
I think bd_start_claiming() needs to do some kind of refcount for the
nested holder case, and bd_abort_claiming() needs to decrement the
refcount and only clear the bd_claiming field when it goes down to
zero.
I dunno. Maybe there's something else going on, but it does look
suspicious, and the above would explain the BUG_ON().
Tejun, Jens?
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16369
> Subject : Yet another 2.6.35 regression (AGP)?
> Submitter : Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@...il.com>
> Date : 2010-07-09 14:21 (24 days old)
> Message-ID : <4C373084.8000503@...il.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127868797119254&w=2
Should hopefully be fixed by commit e7b96f28c58c ("agp/intel: Use the
correct mask to detect i830 aperture size.")
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16365
> Subject : kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:1353
> Submitter : Johannes Hirte <johannes.hirte@....tu-ilmenau.de>
> Date : 2010-07-08 14:27 (25 days old)
> Message-ID : <201007081627.24654.johannes.hirte@....tu-ilmenau.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127859960725931&w=2
This one is reportedly fixed by commit 83ba7b071f30 ("writeback:
simplify the write back thread queue")
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16215
> Subject : sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/net/bnep0'
> Submitter : Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl>
> Date : 2010-06-15 14:55 (48 days old)
> Handled-By : Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Fixed by commit 24b1442d01ae155ea716dfb94ed21605541c317d.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists