linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] NFS: Fix build failure on !CONFIG_NFS_V3 && !CONFIG_NFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E70766A7-AFAB-414A-8FB3-F36275A81CAB@netapp.com>
Date:	Sun, 1 Aug 2010 15:56:16 -0400
From:	"Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: Fix build failure on !CONFIG_NFS_V3 && !CONFIG_NFS_V3

On Aug 1, 2010, at 15:45, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> Btw, is there a reason to allow not building NFSv3?  If at all
> building without v2 support would be more useful.
> 
I am planning to separate nfsv2, nfsv3 and nfsv4 into loadable submodules at some point in the not-too-distant future. That seems like a better solution than these CONFIG suboptions that keep tripping us up.

Cheers
    Trond--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/